Mustafa Shaikh Mohammed And ANR. v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

Sherla V.

wp.5095.2018_9.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5095 OF 2018 Mustafa Shaikh Mohammed & Anr.

... Petitioners Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & anr.

... Respondents Mr.C.G. Gavnekar with G.S. Hiranandani for the Petitioners Mr.A.R. Patil, APP, for the Respondent - State Mr.S.S. Deokar for Resp.No.2 Mr.Kunar Wagmare for Resp. No.3 / Corporation CORAM: Mrs.MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.

DATED: JANUARY 25, 2019 P.C.:

1.

Rule. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents waive notice for the respective respondents. Rule returnable forthwith by consent of the parties and heard finally.

2.

In this case, the learned Counsel for Respondent No.3 - Corporation is present and produces one report given by the Assistant Engineer, Building and Factories, C Ward, dated 1.8.2013, wherein it is stated that he had visited the site pursuant to the objection raised by Jamil Dawood Patel (the original

wp.5095.2018_9.doc complainant in this matter) that new water connection is sanctioned to the occupants as per approved plan. It is further mentioned that the work under reference is found as per the sanction plan.

3.

In view of this, this petition is allowed. Rule made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)