Susy Kuriakose v. Sudhir Gajanan Chitale And ORS

IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL Date: 2021.12.10 11:22:17 +0530 IRESH SIDDHARAM MASHAL 18.606.13 alp.doc ISM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 606 OF 2013 SUSY KURIAKOSE ....APPLICANT V/s.

SUDHIR GAJANAN CHITALE AND ORS .....RESPONDENTS Mr. Mubashir Hussein a/w Mr. Sakib Gufran i/b Hussein & co. Advocates for the applicant Mr. M. G. Patil APP for the State CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE:

DECEMBER 7, 2021.

P.C.:

1] Learned counsel for the applicant informs that respondentaccused nos. 1 & 2 have expired. As such, application abates and disposed of against said accused persons.

2] As far as respondent-accused nos. 3 & 4 are concerned, no specific role or overt act is attributed to them but for offence under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

1/2

18.606.13 alp.doc 3] In the aforesaid background, in view of accused nos. 1 & 2 have expired and rest of the accused have already suffered proceedings for last more than 8 years, in my opinion, no case for grant of leave is made out.

4] Application stands rejected.

[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.] 2/2