← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/30501/2022disposed off

Rahul Narayan Bagal And ORS v. Gaurav Ganesh Das Daga And ORS

2023-01-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

KVM 1/2 1 - IA 30501 OF 2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date: 2023.01.03 18:56:34 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 30501 OF 2022 IN REVIEW PETITION (ST) NO. 31229 OF 2022 Rahul Narayan Bagal & Ors.

..... Review Petitioners

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Gaurav Ganesh Das Daga & Ors.

..... Petitioners

VERSUS

Maharashtra Public Service Commission & Anr.

..... Respondents Ms.Neeta Karnik, a/w. Mr.Sangharsh Waghmare for the Applicants/Petitioners.

Mr.Omkar Kulkarni, i/b. Mr.Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen for the Petitioners in WP/2270/2021.

Dr.Birendra Saraf, Advocate General, a/w. Mr.P.P.Kakade, Government Pleader, Mr.Akshay Shinde, 'B' Panel Counsel for the State - Respondent no.2.

CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 3RD JANUARY, 2023 P.C:- By this interim application, the applicants seek condonation of delay of 283 days in filing the review petition. We have heard learned

KVM 2/2 1 - IA 30501 OF 2022.doc counsel for the parties on merits of the review petition. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners opposed this this interim application on the ground that delay is not sufficiently explained. No affidavit in reply is filed to the review application. We are satisfied that sufficient explanation is rendered in the interim application for seeking condonation of delay in filing review petition, we condone the delay of 283 days in filing the review petition. 3.

Interim application is disposed off accordingly. No order as to costs.

[M.S.KARNIK, J.] [R.D.DHANUKA, J.]