Shri. Pawar Ramkrushna Shantaram And ORS. v. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And ANR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14190 OF 2016 Shri. Pawar Ramkrushna Shantaram And Ors.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Anr.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 806 OF 2016 Shri Suryakant Kashiram More And Anr
...Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Anr
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 900 OF 2016 Shri Ganesh Dilip Patil And Anr.
...Petitioners
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, School Edu. Dept. And Anr.
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2556 OF 2016 Shri Vilas Pralhad Talekar
...Petitioners
Versus
Kurduwadi Municipal Council Through Its Chief Officer And Ors
...Respondents
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2611 OF 2016 Shri Rahul Suresh Rikibe
...Petitioner
Versus
Kurduwadi Municipal Council Through Its Chief Officer And Ors
...Respondents
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3
WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11084 OF 2014 Miss Sunanda Sadashiv Jadhav
...Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary, School Education Dept. And Ors.
...Respondents
---- Mr. Sagar A. Mane i/by Mr.Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, For The Petitioner.
Mr.P.P. More, AGP for the Respondent-State.
---- CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & M.S. SONAK, JJ.
DATE : 12th JUNE 2017 P.C.
1.
Not on Board. Production of papers are allowed at 11.00 a.m.
2.
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned AGP for the Respondent-State, we are of the opinion that this petition can be conveniently disposed of by directing the Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Nashik to decide the representations/proposals dated 18th October, 2016 filed by petitioner No.2 and 20th October, 2016 filed by petitioner No.3 (Copy of which is annexed at Exhibits 'C' & 'D' to the petition), if not already decided, as expeditiously as possible, and within the period N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3
of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order. 3.
Till the Petitioners' claim is decided, the RespondentState is directed to maintain status-quo as it exists today in respect of the transfer of Petitioner No. 1 from unaided school to aided school.
4.
Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (M.S. SONAK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR , J.) N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3