Anita Ramakant Pathak v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(904) wp-5115.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5115 OF 2017 Miss. Anita Ramakant Pathak : Petitioner.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and ors.

: Respondents.

Mr. P R Rathod for the Petitioner.

Mr. K V Saste, Addl. PP for the Respondent/State. CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE :

16th AUGUST 2018 P.C.

The remedy if any of the Petitioner is to file a Revision under Section 397 of the Criminal Procedure Code in the Sessions Court. We therefore do not deem it appropriate to entertain the above Writ Petition. By relegating the Petitioner to the said remedy, the above Writ Petition is disposed of. Needless to state that if any Revision is filed by the Petitioner, the same would undoubtedly be considered on its own merits and in accordance with law. In view of the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 73rd Court, Vikhroli, Mumbai, it is not possible to consider the relief sought vide prayer clause (b) of the above Writ Petition. [REVATI MOHITE DERE, J] [R.M.SAVANT, J] Laxmikant Gopal Chandan by Laxmikant Gopal Chandan Date: 2018.08.20 14:57:06 +0530 lgc