Mrs. Presha Paresh Koli v. Mr. Paresh Kanti Koli

902,903.WP.9472,13034.17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9472 OF 2017 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 13034 OF 2017 Presha Paresh Koli ... Petitioner V/s.

Paresh Kanti Koli ... Respondent Mr. Raju M. Yamgar for the Petitioner.

CORAM :

K.K. SONAWANE, J.

DATE :

20th JULY, 2018.

P.C. :

Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner. Perused the Petition and the affidavit filed on record, which is marked as 'X' for identification.

The Petitioner has specifically asserted that the so called amount of Rs.5 lakhs has not been received at all from the husband for its F.D.R. in the name of minor daughter. In such circumstances, there is no obligation on the part of Petitioner-wife to invest Rs.5 lakhs received from the husband in F.D.R. account in the name of minor daughter. But, the learned Trial Waghmare 1/2

902,903.WP.9472,13034.17.doc Court erroneously observed that Petitioner-wife received Rs.5 lakhs from husband for its investment in the name of daughter. However, the Petitioner-wife does not want to proceed further in present Writ Petition. In such backdrop the learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present Petition.

In view of aforesaid submission and specific denial on the part of Petitioner-wife for receipt of amount of Rs.5 lakhs for F.D.R. in the name of minor daughter, there is no impediment to allow the Petitioner-wife to withdraw present Petition. Hence, leave is granted. Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

(K.K. SONAWANE, J.) Waghmare 2/2