Shri Eknath Dadabhau Shinde And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION [ST.] NO. 34377 OF 2017 Eknath Dadabhau Shinde and Another.

..Petitioners.

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Others.

..Respondents.

Mr. S. M. sabrad for the Petitioner.

Mr. P. G. Sawant, AGP for the State.

Coram : RANJIT MORE & SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, JJ.

Date : January 25, 2018.

P. C. :

1.

At the outset, Mr. Sabrad, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the order in respect of which the contempt has been alleged, is complied with. He states that in that view of the matter, the Petitioner does not want to prosecute further this contempt petition. He accordingly seeks leave to withdraw the contempt petition. Leave granted. Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and is dismissed as such.

[SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.] [RANJIT MORE, J.] patilsr 1 / 1