Vijay Bhikulal Raghuvanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra

30.ba2602.16.sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2602 OF 2016 Vijay Bhikulal Raghuvanshi.

... Applicant.

Versus

The State of Maharashtra.

... Respondent.

--- Mr. Aniket Vagal, advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Arfan Sait, APP for State.

Mr. K.J. Kadam, PSI, Santacruz Police Station. --- CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2017 P.C.:

After arguing for sometime, the Learned Counsel for the applicant seeks liberty to withdraw the application. Liberty as prayed for is granted in the interest of justice. The learned Sessions Judge seized with the Sessions Case No. 124 of 2015 is requested to expedite the trial and conclude the recording of evidence as far as possible within 9 months from the date of framing of charge. The learned Sessions Court shall not grant unwarranted adjournment to Talwalkar 1/2

30.ba2602.16.sxw the prosecution and shall ensure that the accused is produced before the Court on each and every stipulated date, failing which the learned Sessions Court may take appropriate action.

The application stands dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J) Talwalkar 2/2