Bharale Jayraj Appasaheb v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary, School Edu. Dept. And ORS.

prod-18-wp-330-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATTE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.330 OF 2017 (Balance Production Board Dt.11/01/2017) Bharale Jayraj Appasaheb

...Petitioner

vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Others

...Respondents

Mr. S.B. Deshmukh i/b. Mr. R. Deshmukh, for the Petitioner Mrs. R.M. Shinde, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : SHANTANU S. KEMKAR & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE :

JANUARY 12, 2017 P.C.:

.

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. 2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

3.

The only prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is to dispose of this Petition by directing Respondent no. 2 to consider and decide the proposals dated 21st June, 2016 and 16th December, 2016 "Exh. C" submitted by respondent no.4 before him for modification in regard to the teachers' strength due to increase in the students' strength.

Vishal Parekar 1/2

prod-18-wp-330-2017.doc 4.

Keeping in view of the limited prayer made in the Petition without commenting on the merits of the petition and on the proposal made by the fourth Respondent, we are inclined to dispose of the Petition by directing Respondent no.2 to examine the said proposals and take appropriate decision in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible but not later than six weeks from the receipt of copy of this order.

5.

The petition is disposed of as such.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.) Vishal Parekar 2/2