The State Of Maharashtra v. Raghunath Bapu Havdekar Patil And ORS

Tilak 1/2 (14)APPLN-1654-12

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No.1654 of 2012 The State of Maharashtra .. Applicant

Versus

Raghunath Bapu Havdekar Patil & Ors.. Respondents --- Mrs.M.R.Tidke, APP for the Respondent State.

Mr.Sudhir V. Sadavarte, Advocate for respondent nos.1 to 11. CORAM : ABHAY M. THIPSAY, J.

DATED : 27th JANUARY 2015.

--- P.C. :

Heard.

Leave granted.

The Application for leave to Appeal is treated as a Memo of Appeal. It be numbered accordingly.

Necessary amendment be carried out within two weeks.

The Appeal is admitted.

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that he would inform the respondents of this order, and that the respondent no.2 would execute necessary bond before the trial court.

In view of this, it is not necessary to take action under section 390 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Tilak 2/2 (14)APPLN-1654-12 However, respondent no.2 shall execute a bond in the sum of Rs.5,000/- with one surety in like amount before the trial court within a period of four weeks from today. (ABHAY M.THIPSAY, J)