Satish Haribhau Udar v. Sneha Satish Udar And ORS.

(5) CR.REVN-617-18.doc BDP-SPS Bharat D.

Pandit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.617 OF 2018 by Bharat D.

Pandit Date: 2020.01.13 11:46:39 +0530 Shri Satish Haribhau Udar .... Applicant.

V/s Sou. Sneha Satish Udar and Others .... Respondents.

Mr. Vilas B. Tapkir for the Applicant.

Mr. R.M. Pethe, APP for the State.

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE: JANUARY 08, 2020 P.C.:- 1] Petition is by husband, questioning the order of award of maintenance of Rs 4,000/- per month to wife and Rs 3000/- per month to child. Petitioner is also directed to pay rent of Rs 3000/- per month. The order is questioned by the Petitioner on the ground that award of maintenance is on much higher side. In addition, it is claimed that the Petitioner is required to maintain his aged parents. As such, it is claimed that order of award of maintenance is not justified.

2] It is not in dispute, as is apparent from record that gross salary of the Petitioner is Rs 27,457/-.

1/2

(5) CR.REVN-617-18.doc 3] In the aforesaid backdrop, award of maintenance of Rs 3000/- to each of the dependents is very much justified. No case for interference is made out. Petition stands dismissed.

( NITIN W. SAMBRE, J. ) 2/2