← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/33/2016

Smt. Eugene Vaz v. Smt. Shalini Vishwanath Vaigankar And ORS.

2016-01-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.M. Savant.2 pages

caw-33.16(12)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO.33 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6805 OF 2015 Smt. Eugene Vaz : Applicant.

In the matter between Smt. Eugene Vaz : Petitioner versus Smt. Shalini Vishwanath Vaigankar and ors.

: Respondents.

Ms. Anneta Vasani i/by Omprakash A Pandey for the Applicant. Mr. A D Mhandrekar, Constituted Attorney of the Respondent No.1 present.

CORAM :

R. M. SAVANT, J.

DATE :

07th January 2016 P.C.

Not on board. With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the above Civil Application is taken up for hearing. By the above Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking to furnish the fresh address of Respondent No.2 which is mentioned in paragraph 8 by deleting the address which is mentioned in the cause title. The said address has been furnished to the Applicant by the Respondent No.1. The above Civil Application is accordingly allowed. Resultantly the Applicant/Petitioner is allowed to carry out the amendment in the cause title of lgc

caw-33.16(12) the above Writ Petition by incorporating the address of the Respondent No.2 by one given in paragraph 8 of the above Civil Application. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. The above Civil Application is accordingly disposed of. On the amendment being carried out, issue notice to the Respondent No.2 at the corrected address, returnable on 04/02/2016. In addition to service of notice through Court, the advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner shall serve a private notice by Registered Post A.D. and/or by Courier service and/or by hand delivery on the Respondent No.2 and shall file affidavit of service before the returnable date. [R.M.SAVANT, J] lgc