← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/2642/2016others disposed off

Rahul Ramesh Patekar v. The State Of Maharashtra

2017-06-05Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prakash D. Naik1 pages

38.BA.2642.2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO.2642 OF 2016 Rahul Ramesh Patekar Applicant versus The State of Maharashtra Respondent Ms.Anjali Patil for Applicant.

Mr.R.M.Pethe, APP, for State.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE :

05th June 2017 PC :

1.

Learned advocate for the Applicant submits that the Applicant is a young boy aged about 20 years and is in custody since last nine months. She, therefore, submitted that trial may be expedited. She further submitted that in case the trial does not get over within stipulated time, liberty may be granted to the Applicant to file fresh application for bail.

2.

In view of the above, the Applicant is permitted to withdraw this application. Trial is expedited. The Trial Court is directed to complete the trial as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of nine months from today. If the Trial Court does not conclude the trial within nine months, the Applicant would be at liberty to file a fresh application for bail. The application stands dismissed as withdrawn.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) MST