Rahul @ Raosaheb Vinayak Patil v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

24-IA-4587-22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 4587 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2200 OF 2019 Rahul @ Raosaheb Vinayak Patil ... Applicant V/s.

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents ..........

Ms. Mayuri Hatle, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Amit A. Palkar, APP for Respondent-State. ..........

CORAM : G. A. SANAP, J.

DATE : 8th NOVEMBER, 2023 P. C:- 1.

Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant.

2.

This is an application for relaxation of bail condition. 3.

It is pointed out that the evidence of the victim has not been recorded. It is also pointed out that the charges have been framed. It is to be noted that this condition was imposed keeping in mind the facts and circumstances. In my view, till the recording of the evidence of the victim, it would not be appropriate to relax the condition.

S.S.Kilaje page 1 of 2

24-IA-4587-22.doc 4.

Accordingly, Application is rejected.

5.

Learned Judge of the Trial Court is directed to record the evidence within two weeks from the receipt of the copy of this order. On completion of the recording of the evidence of the victim, applicant/accused would be at liberty to apply for fresh relaxation of this condition.

(G. A. SANAP, J.) SONALI SATISH KILAJE by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2023.11.10 18:32:50 +0530 S.S.Kilaje page 2 of 2