Joy Anthony Payapply v. Eureka Joy D/O Alfred Bapista

12.can.32.53.18.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 32 OF 2018 Joy Anthony Payapply ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Eureka Joy ..Petitioner Vs.

Joy Anthony Payapply ..Respondent WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.53 OF 2017 IN CONTEMPT PETITON NO.270 OF 2016 Jessy Barot ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Eureka Joy ..Petitioner Vs.

Joy Anthony Payapply ..Respondent Mr. Parth Sarkar, for the Applicant.

Ms. Pinky Bhansali, for the Petitioner.

CORAM:-K. K. TATED & B. P. COLABAWALLA,JJ.

DATE :- APRIL 5, 2018.

P. C.:

Heard. The learned counsel Mr. Sarkar for the Applicant submits that in view of disposal of Contempt Petition, he do not want to Aswale 1/2

12.can.32.53.18.doc press both these Civil Applications. The statement is accepted and hence both the Civil Applications stand disposed of as not pressed. ( B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. ) ( K. K. TATED, J. ) Aswale 2/2