← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/166/2018disposed off

Ratnagiri Vibag S.T. Kamchari Sahakari Pathsanstha Maryadit , Ratnagiri v. Maharashtra State Transport Corporation And ORS.

2019-01-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sarang Vijaykumar Kotwal,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Indrajit Mahanty3 pages

VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION No. 166 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION No. 10989 OF 2017 Ratnagiri Vibag S. T. Karmchari Sahakari Patsanstha Maryadit, Ratnagiri ...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors.

...

Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 167 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION No. 10986 OF 2017 State Transport Employees Co-Op.

Credit Society Ltd.

...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors.

...

Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 168 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION No. 10987 OF 2017 State Transport Co-Operative Credit Society Ltd.

...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors.

...

Respondents 1 / 3

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 169 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION No. 10990 OF 2017 S. T. Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., Sangli ...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors.

...

Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION No. 170 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION No. 11045 OF 2017 Maharashtra S. T. Kamgar Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit Chandgad ...

Applicant / Petitioner Vs.

Maharashtra State Transport Corporation & Ors.

...

Respondents *** Mr. Kedar Pahad i/b P. D. Dalvi, for the Applicant / Petitioner. Mr. A. P. Vanarase, AGP for Respondent- State in CAW. 166, 167, 168/2018.

Mr. A. A, Alaspurkar, AGP for the Respondent-State in CAW. 169/2018.

Mrs. S. S. Bhende, AGP for the Respondent-State in CAW. 170/2018.

Mr. Gopalkrishna Shivram Hegde, for Respondent No. 2. Mr. Y. P. Deshmukh, for the Respondent.

*** CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY, & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 30, 2019 2 / 3

PC :

.

By these civil applications, applicants therein seek leave to amend the petitions, challenging the circulars dated 16.9.2017 and 30.11.2017 issued by the Respondent-Corporation. After having heard the learned counsel for the respective parties, we are inclined to allow the applications. All the civil applications are accordingly allowed and disposed of in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. Sd/- Sd/- [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.] Vinayak Halemath 3 / 3