Parshuram Hari More v. The State Of Maharashtra

ba.1241 & 3122.18.9.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1241 OF 2018 Manish Ganpat Yadav ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3122 OF 2018 Parshuram Hari More ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Mr. Akhilesh Chitre h/f Mr. Rushikesh Salkar for the Applicant in BA/1241/2018 Mr. Aniket Vagal for the Applicant in BA/3122/2018 Ms. P. P. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State PI Mr. Sunil Yadav from Oshiwara Police Station, is present CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

FRIDAY, 5 th JULY 2019 P.C. :

At the outset, learned A.P.P, on instructions, states that trial has commenced and that five witnesses have been examined till date. She submits that the prosecution intends to examine as many as 20 more witnesses.

SQ Pathan 1/2

ba.1241 & 3122.18.9.doc Since the trial has commenced, it is not necessary to consider the applications for bail, at this stage. Applications are accordingly disposed of. However, the trial of the applicants is expedited. The learned Sessions Judge to dispose of the case as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within 12 months from today.

Applications are disposed of accordingly.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

SQ Pathan 2/2