Santosh Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

rsk 1/2 40-APL-1820-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO.1820 OF 2019 Santosh Kumar Tiwari ...Applicant vs.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

---- Mr. Pranav Badheka a/w Mr.Ryan Srivastava and Mr. Niranjan Pachupate i/b HK Law Associates for the Applicant.

Mr.Vivek Sharma for Respondent No.2.

Mr. Sooraj S. Hulke, APP for the Respondent/State. P.I. Sonawane, Oshiwara Police Station.

---- CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE & N. R. BORKAR, J.

DATE : 3/3/2020.

P.C.:

.

Mr. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.2 is seeking time of two weeks to file reply.

2.

However, learned APP upon instruction from investigating officer states that investigation is over and "B" summary is being filed. 3.

In view of this statement learned counsel for the applicant submits that the application may be disposed of as infructuous. 4.

Learned counsel for Respondent No. 2 is opposing the request. 5.

We keep contention of the parties open. However, as

rsk 2/2 40-APL-1820-19.doc investigation is completed and "B" summary is being filed, there is no point in keeping the present matter pending.

6.

Accordingly, keeping all contentions open we dispose of the present proceedings.

(N. R. BORKAR, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)