Anis Usman Gani v. State Of Maharashtra

by HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV Date:

2023.07.24 22:23:54 +0530 HEMANT CHANDERSEN SHIV 31.ba3789.22.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.3789 OF 2022 Anis Usman Gani ...Applicant vs.

State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

Ms. Roohita Shaikh with Javed Shaikh with Anil Nile for the Applicant.

Mr. S. R. Agarkar APP for the Respondent-State. Mr. Yogesh Dhondge, PSI, Rabodi police station. CORAM :S. M. MODAK, J.

DATED :19TH JULY 2023 P. C. :

1.

After hearing learned Advocate for the Applicant and learned APP, considering the materials pointed out, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to this Applicant.

2.

The Applicant is named in the FIR. The medical certificate is also shown to me. For the offence under Section 307 of IPC, not only injuries but intention is also important. It can be evidenced from the weapon used and part of body to be inflicted. No doubt the Applicant has lodged the FIR, but it is not due to assault at the same Shiv 1/2

31.ba3789.22.doc time but while running away from the place of incident, the Applicant was assaulted.

3.

Application is disposed of as withdrawn.

4.

Liberty is granted to the Applicant to move this Court after six months, if there is no progress before the trial Court. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Shiv 2/2