← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/3380/2023rejected

Saniya Sayyadali Quadri v. State Of Maharashtra

2023-12-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik2 pages

2023:BHC-AS:38169 Darshan Patil 46-aba-3380-23.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 3380/2023 SANIYA SAYYADALI QUADRI ..APPLICANT VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Sanjay R. Singh for the Applicant.

Mr. Y.Y. Dabke, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 18, 2023 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for the State.

2.

This is an application for pre-arrest bail in respect of the offence punishable under Sections 420, 409 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code registered on 31/03/2022 vide C.R. No.147 of 2022 with B.K.C. Police Station.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant prayed for the release of the applicant on pre-arrest bail. Learned counsel for the applicant invited my attention to the order dated 04/01/2023 passed by this Court in respect of the present 1/2

Darshan Patil 46-aba-3380-23.doc applicant in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3168 of 2022. 4.

Learned counsel for the applicant made an attempt to re-argue the matter on merits while seeking relief for anticipatory bail. Having rejected the earlier anticipatory bail application on merits, I am not inclined to entertain the present application on the basis of similar submissions. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is willing to deposit a sum of Rs.20,00,000/- within two days from today and that the further sum of Rs.20,00,000/-, two months time may be given. However, having rejected the earlier application for anticipatory bail, it is not possible for me to consider the proposal made. 5.

The anticipatory bail application stands rejected. (M. S. KARNIK, J.) 2/2