Shaikh Abdul Kased And ANR v. Kalpesh Babulal Jain And ORS

901-902-903-CAO355-18+.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 355 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 35960 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 586 OF 2017 Shaikh Abdul Kased & Anr

...Petitioners

Versus

Kalpesh Babulal Jain & Ors

...Respondents

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 455 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 36182 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 463 OF 2017 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 456 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 36172 OF 2017 IN APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 462 OF 2017 Mr VS Kapse, for the Applicants/Petitioners in all Review Petitions. 10th February 2020

901-902-903-CAO355-18+.DOC Mr Ranjit Thorat, with Mr Dharam Sharma & Smt Uma Sharma, i/b Dharam & Co, for Respondents Nos. 1 & 2 in all Review Petitions.

Mr Sanjay Jain, with Mr Rajesh Jain, for Respondents Nos. 3 & 6 in all Review Petitions.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J.

DATED:

10th February 2020 PC:- 1.

After some arguments Mr Kapse, learned Advocate for the Review Petitioners, with his usual fairness and on taking instructions from the Review Petitioners, all of whom are said to be present in Court, seeks leave to withdraw the Review Petitions. 2.

The Review Petitions are dismissed as unconditionally withdrawn.

3.

The Review Petitioners are present in Court.

4.

Mr Kapse undertakes to file his vakalatnama in the Registry within a period of one week, if already not filed. 5.

In view thereof, the Civil Applications are infructuous and are disposed of as such.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 10th February 2020