← Library
Bombay High CourtCAO/56/2019compromisedconsent terms

Shri.Ashok Narsinghrao Bhosale v. Smt.Ashwini Ashok Bhosale

2021-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Virendrasingh Gyansingh Bisht1 pages

bdp 1/1 7-cao-56.19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 56 OF 2019 IN CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 10 OF 2018 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO. 19323 OF 2017 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2006 Ashok Narsinghrao Bhosale ... Applicant

Versus

Ashwini Ashok Bhosale ... Respondent ****** Mr. Sushil A. Inamdar for the Applicant.

None for the Respondent.

****** CORAM: R. D. DHANUKA AND V. G. BISHT, JJ.

DATE : 13th JANUARY, 2021.

P.C. :- .

There are criminal proceedings pending between the parties. The respondent is admittedly appearing in those criminal proceedings through her advocate. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the learned advocate appearing for the respondent would be served with the notice and the papers and proceedings in this matter, in those proceedings. Statement is accepted. In case, the learned advocate for the respondent does not accept service of these proceedings in that proceedings, we will consider the grant of prayer for substituted service on the next date.

2.

Stand over to 1st February, 2021.

[V. G. BISHT, J.] [R. D. DHANUKA, J.]