← Library
Bombay High CourtARP/222/2023allowed

Rajani Dwarkanath Paudwal v. Shri Kerba Shripati Chougule

2024-03-04Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Bharati Dangre2 pages

1/2 39 ARP 222-23.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 222 Of 2023 Rajani Dwarkanath Paudwal ..

Petitioner

Versus

Shri Kerba Shripati Chougule ..

Respondent ...

Mr. Mandar Bagkar i/b Chetan Patil for the petitioner. Mr. Shantanu Patil i/b Shrikrishna Ganbavle for the respondent. CORAM: BHARATI DANGRE, J.

DATED : 4th MARCH, 2024 P.C:- Petition filed under Section 29-A seek extension of the Arbitral Tribunal by further period of six months and it is informed that the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal are now scheduled for cross-examination fo the witness of the respondent. Since the factual aspect of the appointment of the Arbitrator for resolving the disputes between the partnership deed is not in dispute, so also the proceedings before the Arbitral Tribunal, since the respective counsel are at consensus that if the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended, the proceedings shlal be concluded, I deem it appropriate to allow the petition in terms of prayer clause (a).

Tilak

2/2 39 ARP 222-23.doc By consent of the parties, the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended by further period of six months from today. ( SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.) Tilak