Murad Kasim Khadpolkar v. State Of Maharashtra

2023:BHC-AS:35946 Diksha Rane 502. IA 4420-23.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.4420/2023 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.2924/2023 MURAD KASIM KHADPOLKAR ..APPLICANT VS.

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ..RESPONDENT ------------ Adv. Shubhada Khot for the applicant.

Ms. Rutuja Ambekar, APP for the State.

------------ CORAM : M. S. KARNIK, J.

DATE : DECEMBER 4, 2023.

P.C. :

1.

Not on board; taken on board.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

3.

The application is opposed by learned APP for the State.

4.

For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a). The applicant is permitted to furnish the surety from any District in Maharashtra.

5.

Time to furnish the surety is extended by further period of six (6) weeks from today.

6.

The application is disposed of accordingly.

(M. S. KARNIK, J.) 1/1