← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/1501/2019dismissed

Kalpesh Wadilal Shah v. The State Of Maharashtra

2021-11-18Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Anuja Prabhudessai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by MEGHA S PARAB Date:

2021.11.24 13:56:46 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1501 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.87 OF 2021 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.87 OF 2021 Kalpesh Wadilal Shah ...Applicant MEGHA S PARAB

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

....

Mr. Vivek Arote i/b. Mr. Ashish Satpute for the Applicant. Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, APP for Respondent -State.

CORAM : SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.

DATED: 18th NOVEMBER, 2021.

P.C.:- INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1501 OF 2019:- By this application fled under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Applicant has sought suspension of substantive sentence imposed vide judgment dated 08/01/2019 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1, Vasai in POCSO Special Case No.42 of 2016 and to enlarge the Applicant on bail. 2.

By the impugned judgment the learned Judge has held the Applicant guilty of ofence punishable under Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Ofences Act, 2012 and sentenced 1/3

to undergo simple imprisonment for 10 years and to pay fne of Rs.10,000/- i/d. to sufer simple imprisonment for six months. 3.

Heard Mr. Vivek Arote, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr. P.H. Gaikwad, learned APP for Respondent -State. Perused the records.

4.

The material on record prima facie indicates that the victim boy was below 18 years of age and hence a 'child' within the meaning of Section 2(d) of the POCSO Act. The evidence of the victim boy prima facie reveals that the Applicant, who was residing in the same locality had taken him to his house, shown obscene video clips and subjected him to carnal and oral intercourse. The material on record prima facie indicates that the Applicant herein had subjected the minor to penetrative sexual assault. Considering the nature of the ofence and material in support thereof this is not a ft case for suspension of sentence and releasing the Applicant on bail. Hence, the application is dismissed.

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.87 OF 2021:- 5.

Leave is granted to the Appellant to implead the complainant as Respondent No.2. Registry thereafter to issue notice to 2/3

Respondent No.2, returnable on 29/11/2021. Learned APP also to make an endeavour to intimate next date of hearing to Respondent No.2-complainant /victim.

6.

Stand over to 29/11/2021.

(SMT. ANUJA PRABHUDESSAI, J.) 3/3