← Library
Bombay High CourtCAW/1009/2019allowed

Mr. Arun Vitthal Dolas v. Mr. Siddik Ahmed Tiwale (Since Decd.) Through Lrs. And ANR.

2022-12-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav2 pages

41(i).caw.1009.19.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1009 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 7430 OF 2015 Arun Vitthal Dolas ..Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Arun Vitthal Dolas ..Petitioner

Versus

Siddik Ahmed Tiwale (Since deceased) Through Legal Heirs Mumtaz Siddique Tiwale and Ors.

..Respondents ....................

 Mr. Rohit D. Joshi, Advocate for Applicant / Petition.  Mr. Y.G. Thorat i/by Mr. S.B. Thorat, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1A to 1D.

...................

CORAM :MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE :DECEMBER 23, 2022.

P.C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Joshi, leaned Advocate appearing for Applicant. 2.

This is a Civil Application filed for condoning of delay of 183 days in filing the same and bringing the legal heirs of deceased Respondent No.1 on record. Respondent No.1 has expired on 05.02.2018.

3.

Perused the Civil Application. For the reasons stated therein, the delay of 183 days in filing the Application is condoned and the legal heirs of Deceased Respondent No.1 are permitted to be

41(i).caw.1009.19.doc brought on record.

4.

Civil Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'c'. 5.

Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks from today. Re-verification stands dispensed with. 6.

Civil Application is disposed of in the above terms. [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2022.12.24 09:22:06 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE