Mr. Kamruddin Ibrahim Teli v. The Commissioner Thane Municipal Corporation And ANR

WP. 92-18.doc VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 92 OF 2018 Kamruddin Ibrahim Teli ...

Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner, Thane Municipal Commissioner, Thane & Anr.

Respondents *** Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle, for the Petitioner.

Mr. Mandar Limaye, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. *** CORAM : A. S. OKA, & P. N. DESHMUKH, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 8, 2018 PC :

1.

Not on board. Taken on board.

2.

The learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, on instructions of Mr. Shailendra Bendale, Officer / Executive Engineer, states that though according to the Respondents the subject structure of the Petitioner is an unauthorised structure, the Respondents will follow due process of law, as laid down in the case of Sopan Maruti 1 / 2

WP. 92-18.doc Thopte & Anr. Vs. Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr.1. We accept the said statement. In view of this statement, petition need not be kept pending and the same is disposed of by accepting the aforesaid statement.

Sd/- Sd/- [P. N. DESHMUKH, J.] [A. S. OKA, J.] Vinayak Halemath 1996 (2) All MR 383 2 / 2