Meghna Prakash Gudekar@Meghna S Lingave v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

1/2 18-wp.5625.2018.doc nsc.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.5625 OF 2018 Meghna Prakash Gudekar @ Meghna S. Lingave

...Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Mr.S.S.Tambe, for the Petitioner.

Mr. F. R. Shaikh, A.P.P. for the Respondent - State. Ms.Saili N. Dhuru, for the Respondent No.2.

CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

DATE : 14th JANUARY, 2019 P.C. :

1.

Heard respective counsel.

2.

The Petitioner and Respondent No.2 are present. 3.

Respondent No.2 is original complainant. She has filed an affidavit stating that dispute between the parties is settled. Parties are

2/2 18-wp.5625.2018.doc jointly requesting for quashing of FIR.

4.

It appears that the loan transaction is at the root of complaint. We, therefore, find that State machinery has been misused and public money has been lost.

5.

Considering the financial condition of the parties, we, direct them, to pay to the Police Welfare Fund or State of Maharashtra, costs of Rs.5,000/- each, within two weeks. On payment of such costs, relief in terms of prayer clause (a) shall become absolute. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.