Arunkumar Dudhnathlal Shrivastava v. Kumari Tanu Arunkumar Shrivastava And ANR.

wp.5663.18.28.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 5663 OF 2018 Arunkumar Dudhnathlal Shrivastava

...Petitioner

Versus

Kumari Tanu Arunkumar Shrivastava & Anr.

...Respondents

Mr. Dinesh Tiwari a/w Mr. Mikhail Dey I/b Dinesh Tiwari & Associates for the Petitioner Mrs. S. D. Shinde, A.P.P for the Respondent-State CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ.

THURSDAY, 10 th JANUARY 2019 P.C. :

Heard learned counsel. Perused the papers.

In view of statement under Section 161 and under Section 164 Cr.P.C. given by victim, we are not in position to accept the contention of petitioner. Petitioner can move trial Court for appropriate directions. With this liberty, we dispose of present matter. REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.

SQ Pathan 1/1