Heena Vichare v. Union Of India And ANR

p.601.crpilst-55.18 sbw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST)NO.55 OF 2018 Heena Vichare ... Petitioner vs.

Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Pooja Thorat I/b. Mr. Fauzan Shaikh for the petitioner. Ms. Prajakta P. Shinde, APP, for respondent no.2. CORAM : A.A.SAYED & A. K. MENON,JJ.

DATE : 22ND DECEMBER,2018.

P.C.:

1.

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that there are substantial corrections and additions required in the PIL. She seeks leave to withdraw the PIL with liberty to file a fresh PIL. 2.

The PIL is allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. (A.K.MENON,J.) (A.A.SAYED,J.) wadhwa