Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

4- APPA. 2063-18 VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION No. 2063 OF 2018 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 1375 OF 2018 Seema Arunkumar Sharma ...

Appellant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...

Respondents And Pankaj Ramnaresh Saraf ...

Applicant / Intervenor in APPA.

*** Mr. Sandeep R. Karnik, for the Applicant Mr. D. H. Shukla, for the Appellant.

Mr. H. J. Dedhia, APP for Respondent - State. *** CORAM : INDRAJIT MAHANTY, & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 3, 2019 PC :

.

Heard the learned advocate for the applicant and the learned advocate for the Appellant. The intervenor appears to be a party before the trial court. Therefore, in spite of objections on behalf of the appellant, intervention of the applicant in the appeal is allowed. The applicant - intervenor be added as party respondent No. 3 to the appeal. The appellant to serve copy of the appeal memo on the newly added respondent No. 3. The criminal application is accordingly disposed of as allowed. Sd/- Sd/- [SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.] [INDRAJIT MAHANTY, J.] Vinayak Halemath