Dagadu Maruti Thadake v. Smt. Anjana Eknath Savardekar And ORS

13-1-CAW-616-19.doc Sharayu Khot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 616 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9499 OF 2018 Dagadu Maruti Thadake ...Intervener/ Applicant In the matter between Smt. Anjana Eknath Savardekar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

...Respondents

---------- Mr. Manoj G. Sawardekar for the Applicant.

Mr. Prashant Bhavake for the Petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. Umesh H. Pawar for the Respondent Nos. 6 and 7. ---------- CORAM :

R.D. DHANUKA & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE :

26 August 2021 (V.C.) ORDER :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

1/2

13-1-CAW-616-19.doc 2.

Learned Counsel for the Petitioner states that his client has no objection if the Civil Application fled by the Intervener is allowed. Statement is accepted. 3.

The Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.

Amendment to be carried out by the Petitioner within a period of one week from the date of the order and to implead the Applicant/Intervener as Respondent No. 8. 5.

Respondent No. 8 is permitted to fle Affdavit in Reply within a period of two weeks from today with a copy to be served upon the Petitioner's Advocate simultaneously. [R.I. CHAGLA J.] [R.D. DHANUKA, J.] 2/2