Sagar Suryawanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra

1/2 Yadav 927.aba.2725.18 aw 928.aba.2726.18 (corrected)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2725 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 125 OF 2019 Sagar Suryawanshi ...

Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 2726 OF 2018 WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2019 Ms. Sheetal Tejwani ...

Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra ...

Respondent Mr. Vikrant Suryawanshi for Applicant in both the Anticipatory Bail Applications.

Mr. Nilesh Ojha a/w Kartavya, Vijay Kurle I/by Shashikala Chauhan for Intervener in both the Criminal Applications. Ms. S. S. Kaushik, APP for Respondent - State in both the Applications. Mr. Satish Walke, PSI, Shivaji Nagar Police Station, Pune present in Court. CORAM :

NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.

DATE :

JANUARY 25, 2019.

P.C. :

.

The leaned Counsel for Applicant, upon instruction, makes a motion for withdrawal of both the Anticipatory Bail Applications.

2/2 Yadav 927.aba.2725.18 aw 928.aba.2726.18 (corrected) 2.

As such, both the Anticipatory Bail Applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

It shall be open to the parties or the learned Sessions Court to bring the issue as regards allotment of application to a particular Court to the notice of the Principal District Judge, Pune, who shall be at liberty to pass an appropriate order in the given set of facts and circumstances.1 4.

Since both the Anticipatory Bail Applications are dismissed as withdrawn, Criminal Application Nos.125 of 2019 and 126 of 2019 do not survive. Hence, both the Applications stand disposed of accordingly. (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Pursuant to the Speaking to the minutes order dt/-31/1/2019 corrections are carried out in original order.