Santosh Eknath Aher v. State Of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader And 4 ORS

14.2886.17-wp.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.2886/2017 Basavraj G. Patil Basavraj G. Patil Date: 2020.01.09 16:12:45 +0530 Santosh Eknath Aher ..... Petitioner Vs.

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..... Respondents Mr. Omprakash Pandey a/w. Ms. Aneeta Vasani for the Petitioner Mr. Amit Shastri, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3. Mr. Pushkal Mishra a/w. Mr. Chetan Mhatre i/b. Utangale & Co. for Respondent Nos.4 and 5.

CORAM:

K.K.TATED & SARANG V. KOTWAL,JJ.

DATED :

JANUARY 7, 2020 P.C.

Heard. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner challenges the order dated 28.02.2017 passed by the Additional District Collector (Encroachment/Eviction), Western Suburb, Mumbai in Appeal No.1641/2016 and order dated 18.07.2017 passed by the Dy. District Collector (Encroachment/Eviction) and Competent Authority, Andheri-2, Mumbai.

During the course of arguments, the learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to prefer an appropriate appeal before the Additional District Collector, Western Suburb, Mumbai. Basavraj G. Patil 1/2

14.2886.17-wp.odt To that effect, he has given in writing. Same is taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

3.

The Writ Petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to prefer an appropriate appeal before the competent authority, which shall be decided on merits without being influenced by this order. No order as to costs. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (K.K.TATED, J.) Basavraj G. Patil 2/2