Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Murugan R. Udaiyar And ANR

11, 13.doc Tauseef

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.379 OF 2016 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

...Applicant V/S.

Vishnuprasad Balgovind Keshri & Chanda Vishnuprasad Keshri

...Respondents

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.381 OF 2016 Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

...Applicant V/S.

Murugan R. Udaiyar & Anr.

...Respondents

Ms. Vaishali D. Padale, Advocate for Applicants.

CORAM

: G.S. KULKARNI, J.

DATED : 12th FEBRUARY 2020.

P.C. :

1.

These Execution Applications have not been proceeded with for a period of over 12 months from the date of filing of the applications. Accordingly, these applications are placed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court Original Side Rules, before the Court, for dismissal, for want of prosecution. 2.

Learned counsel for the applicants/claimants however seeks time to take appropriate steps within two weeks from today. Pg 1 of 2

11, 13.doc 3.

In the event appropriate steps are not taken within two weeks, these applications would stand disposed of with liberty to file a fresh applications as an when necessary, as may be permissible in law. 4.

If appropriate steps are taken, office to list these applications as per C.M.I.S. date.

(G.S. KULKARNI, J.) Pg 2 of 2