← Library
Bombay High CourtNMW/46/2018dismissed

Birla Precision Technologies Ltd And ANR v. Sitaram Yesu Gurav (Died) Through Legal Representative Smt. Satyawati Sitaram Gurav (Widow)

2018-06-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte2 pages

nmw46&group-18.doc sg

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.46 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1167 OF 2017 Birla Precision Technologies Ltd. And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs Sitaram Yesu Gurav (Died) Through Legal Representative Smt. Satyawati Sitar

...Respondent

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.48 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1131 OF 2017 Birla Precision Technologies Ltd. And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs Tukaram Narayan Sawant

...Respondent

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.9 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1151 OF 2017 Birla Precision Technologies Ltd. And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs Arun Dinkar Reghe

...Respondent

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.27 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1136 OF 2017 Birla Precision Technologies Ltd. And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs Devji Kashinath Chawarkar

...Respondent

WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.33 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1122 OF 2017 Pg 1 of 2

nmw46&group-18.doc Birla Precision Technologies Ltd. And Anr.

...Petitioners

vs Bhaskar Shankar Gawde

...Respondent

.....

Mr. Priten P. Killedar, for Applicants/Petitioners. ......

CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATED: JUNE 4, 2018 P.C. :

.

Learned Counsel appearing in the matter seeks discharge of the Advocate for the Applicants/Petitioners. Learned Counsel submits that there are no instructions from the Applicants/Petitioners. It is noticed from the record of proceedings that at least on last three occasions none appeared for the Applicants/Petitioners. Even today, the Advocate on record seeks discharge on the ground of want of instructions. Whereas the Advocate may apply for its discharge in the registry, there is a clear case for dismissal of the Notices of Motion. The motions are, accordingly, dismissed. No order as to costs. ( S.C. GUPTE, J. ) Pg 2 of 2