Dr. Hemalata Muthulingom v. The University Of Mumbai And Department Of Atomic Energy And 3 ORS

VPH

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION No. 1647 OF 2017 NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 375 OF 2017 CONTEMPT PETITION No. 46 OF 2017 Dr. Hemalatha Muthulingom, Residing at F-1, Academic Staff Quarters, University of Mumbai Kalina, Santacruz (East), Petitioner / (Applicant in NMWL. 375/2017) 1 / 6

WRIT PETITION No. 1034 OF 2017 NOTICE OF MOTION (L) No. 667 OF 2017 Dr. Gargi Shaw, Residing at 904, Bhaskara, TFIR Housing Complex, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005 AND Departmen of Physics, UM-DAE Centre For Excellence in Basic Petitioner 2 / 6

5.

Prof. S. M. Chitre, Senior Faculty, Department of Atomic energy Centre ) for Excellence in Basic Sciences, University of Mumbai And University of Mumbai & Department ) of Atomic Energy Centre for Excellence in basic Sciences, University of Mumbai, Kalina Campus, Santacruz (East), Dr. R. V. Hosur, Director, University of Mumbai & Department ) of Atomic Energy Centre for Excellence in basic Sciences, 3 / 6

University of Mumbai, Kalina Campus, Santacruz (East), Applicants (in WPL. No. 667/2017) WRIT PETITION (L) No. 2442 OF 2017 Dr. Gargi Shaw, Residing at 904, Bhaskara, TFIR Housing Complex, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400 005 Dr. Hemalatha Muthulingom, Residing at F-1, Academic Staff Quarters, University of Mumbai Kalina, Santacruz (East), Petitioners 4 / 6

5.

Prof. S. M. Chitre, Senior Faculty, Department of Atomic energy Centre ) for Excellence in Basic Sciences, University of Mumbai *** Mr. Mihir Desai, Sr. Counsel a/w C. K. Thomas i/b M/s. C. K. Thomas & Associates, for the Petitioners in all writ petitions. Mr. S. S. Pakale a/w Saurabha Pakale i/b S. M. Katkar, for Respondent No. 1 in all writ petitions.

Mr. P. M. Palshikar, for Respondent No. 2 in all writ petitions. Mr. Rui Rodrigues, for Respondent No. 3 in all writ petitions. *** CORAM : B. R. GAVAI, & MANISH PITALE, JJ.

RESERVED ON : DECEMBER 8, 2017 PRONOUNCED ON : DECEMBER 19, 2017 5 / 6

PC :

At this stage, Mr. Thomas, learned counsel for the Petitioners requests that the quarters which are in occupation of the Petitioners under the interim order may be continued to be retained for a further period of six months.

We find that even if the Petitioners desire to challenge the order passed by us in the Hon'ble Supreme Court, six weeks period is more than sufficient. In that view of the matter, we direct that the Petitioners be permitted to retain their respective quarters for a further period of six weeks from today.

Sd/- Sd/- [MANISH PITALE, J.] [B. R. GAVAI, J.] Vinayak Halemath 6 / 6