Sapna Mishram v. Bank Of India And 2 ORS

Before : Shri A. M. Chandekar Prothonotary & Senior Master Date : 06th April, 2018 FOR HEARING & FINAL DISPOSAL (ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS) : CHOL/22/2018 WPL/1392/2017 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Ms. Divya Srivastava, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. Shinde, Manager of Respondent - Bank is present.

P.C. :

Instant Chamber Order is taken out for setting aside Order dated 28.11.2017, rejecting Petition for non-removal of office objections.

Perused Affidavit in Support. Heard Ld.

Counsel for Applicant. Affidavit in Support reveals that due to illness, ld.

Counsel for Applicant could not remove office objections.

Despite of sufficient opportunities, Respondent No. 1 failed to file reply.

None present on behalf of Respondent No. 2 despite of service.

Hence, contention of the Applicant needs to be accepted as sufficient reason for allowing instant Chamber Order.

Accordingly, Chamber Order is granted as prayed and signed separately.

Applicant and/or his Advocate to remove office objections on the Petition and get the same numbered and regd.

on or before 20-04-2018, failing Petition to stand rejected for non-removal of office objections under O.S. Rule 986.

Date : 06.04.2018 Prothonotary & Senior Master