Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. v. Rishabh D. Saraf

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1396 OF 2022 (SERIAL NO. 85) Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ...Applicant Vs.

Rishabh D. Saraf

...Respondent

...

Advocate Mandar Goswami i/by MPG Legal - for Applicant - Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.

Ms. Smita Bhosale, Authorized Representative of Applicant. ...

CORAM

: S. M. MODAK J.

[HEAD OF THE PANEL] V. V. KATHARE REGISTRAR (VIGILANCE-II) MEMBER S. N. PHAD DEPUTY REGISTRAR MEMBER DATED : 03rd MARCH, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

Ms. Smita Bhosale, the Authorized Representative of the decree 1/3 by SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR Date:

2024.04.20 15:15:58 +0530 SEEMA KSHITIJ YELKAR

holder viz. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited is present. Learned Advocate Mr. Mandar Goswami representing the Applicant is also present. 2.

Ms. Smita Bhosale has placed on record the common original Authority Letter duly signed by Mr. Brijesh Singh, Senior Vice President, whereby she has been authorized as a representative on behalf of the decree holder/Applicant and her Identity Card and Aadhar Card for the purpose of identification. The copies of Authority Letter, identity card and Aadhar card are taken on record and marked as 'Annexure-X, Y & Z' respectively in all above proceedings.

3.

The learned Advocate on behalf of the Applicant/decree holder under the instructions of representative submitted that the ApplicantKotak Mahindra Bank Limited desires to withdraw above Execution Application.

4.

In view of the same, above Execution application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

5.

The Decree Holder is at liberty to withdraw the deposited amount, if any.

6.

It is submitted that warrant of the attachment is not issued by learned Prothonotary, hence there is no question of the payment of 2/3

poundage.

7.

The Court fees, if any, liable to be refunded, be refunded as per rules.

[S. N. PHAD] [V. V. KATHARE] [ S. M. MODAK J.] HEAD OF THE PANEL MEMBER MEMBER 3/3