← Library
Bombay High CourtAPP/308/2015

Santosh Prabhakar Salvi And ANR v. Smt. Jamunabai Reghu Kachare

2015-09-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Kanade,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi3 pages

Dixit

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.308 OF 2015 IN REVOCATION PETITION NO.130 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO.673 OF 2008 Santosh Prabhakar Salvi & Anr.

....

Appellants V/s.

Jamunabai Raghu Kachare ....

Respondent Mr. Shailesh Shah, Sr. Counsel, a/w. Ms. Saloni Ghule, i/by Mr. H.V. Kode, for the Appellants. Mr. Ranjit Thorat, Sr. Counsel, a/w. Mr. Pradeep Thorat, i/by Mr. J.S. Suryawanshi, for the Respondent.

CORAM : V.M. KANADE & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.J.

DATE : 7 TH SEPTEMBER, 2015.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The Appellants are aggrieved by the order dated 15th December, 2014, thereby setting aside probate to a Will dated 4th April, 1998 and allowing the Petition for revocation filed by the Respondent herein. 1/3

3.

The Respondent herein is a daughter of a sister of a Hindu widow, who was not served with the citation. It is an admitted position that the Hindu widow did not leave any other Class-I heir. The learned Single Judge, therefore, was of the view that service of citation was necessary and this being not done, the Probate, which was granted, was set aside. The learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the Appellants submitted that the Appellants had also raised an issue regarding the actual identity of the Respondent. It is submitted that it was their case that she was not the sister of the widow, who has expired. It is submitted that this issue was not considered by the learned Single Judge.

4.

In our view, there is no infirmity in the order passed by the learned Single Judge. The issue as to whether the Respondent was, in fact, the daughter of the Hindu widow's sister, will have to be decided in the Probate Petition and not in the Petition for revocation. Hence, we are not inclined to interfere with the said order. The Appeal is dismissed.

5.

All contentions of both the parties are kept open, including the question as to whether the Respondent is the sister's daughter of the Hindu widow.

6.

Order of status-quo is vacated forthwith.

7.

Liberty is granted to the Appellants to apply for ad-interim relief, if he so desires.

[DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.] [V.M. KANADE, J.] 2/3

C E R T I F I C A T E Certified to be true and correct copy of the original signed Order.

3/3