M/S Pams Industries v. The Commissioner Of Customs (Appeals) Mumbai Zone-I

8-CHOL.58.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER ORDER NO. 58 OF 2018 IN CUSTOMS APPEAL (L) NO. 2 OF 2017 M/s. Pams Industries } Appellant versus The Commissioner of } Customs (Appeals) } Mumbai Zone-I } Respondents Ms. Rubina Dodhia i/b. M/s. Jaykar and Partners for the appellant.

None for the respondents.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE :- JANUARY 22, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

We have heard the learned advocate appearing for the appellant. We have perused the chamber order. We do not think that in the facts and circumstances of the case, we should deprive the appellant of a remedy of appeal and once it is filed/lodged, to argue it on merits. In the circumstances and in facts peculiar to this case, we condone the delay in filing this chamber order. 2.

We quash and set aside the order of the Prothonotary and Senior Master. We grant, as requested by the appellant's advocate, two weeks' time to remove all office objections. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA