The Commissioner Of Income Tax- 12 Mumbai v. Ronak Parikh (Huf)

ITXA5802_10.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.5802 OF 2010 The Commissioner of Income Tax-12 Mumbai ...

Appellant Vs.

Ronak Parikh (HUF) ...

Respondent Mr. P. C. Chhotaray for Appellant.

Mr. B. V. Jhaveri for Respondent.

CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN, MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE :

MARCH 02, 2020 P.C. :

Heard Mr. Chhotaray, learned standing Counsel Revenue for the appellant and Mr. Jhaveri, learned counsel for the respondent / assessee. 2.

This appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been preferred by the Revenue against the order dated 13.08.2009 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bench 'G', Mumbai in I.T.A.No.2148/Mum/2004 for the assessment year 1999-2000. 3.

In view of the order passed today in Writ Petition No.1813 of 2009, this appeal has become infructuous and is disposed of as infructuous.

(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (UJJAL BHUYAN, J.) Minal Parab 1/1