Narayan M. Pagar v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1210 OF 2005 ALONG WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO.271 OF 2004 Narayan Murlidhar Pagar .. Petitioner-Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra, Through Higher & Technical Education Department and Ors.

.. Respondents Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Rajendra B. Khaire and Mr. Aniket S. Phapale, for the Petitioner-Applicant. Mr. Vishal Thadani, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent-State of Maharashtra. Mr. Mahendra Agvekar, with Ms. Shraddha Chavan, i/by Mr. P.M. Palshikar, for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & JITENDRA JAIN, JJ DATE : 31ST JANUARY, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

On 15th January 2024, time was granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to obtain necessary instructions. Today it is submitted that the petitioner has not given any instructions to the learned Advocate. 2.

We have perused the writ petition and the documents annexed thereto. It is seen that on 3rd March 2003, the Registrar, University of Mumbai - respondent no.2 issued a communication to the respondent no.4-College to implement the recommendation of the Grievances Committee and pay the petitioner salary as per the Full Time Lecturer Scale. Since this direction was not complied with, the present writ petition was filed.

3.

While issuing Rule in the writ petition on 9th March 2004, the 1/2 Digitally signed by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date:

2024.02.01 10:11:05 +0530 7-WP-1210-2005 & NMW-271-2004.doc Dixit SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT

interim relief was granted in terms of prayer clauses (d) and (e). As a result, the petitioner was paid the arrears of salary and he continued to receive his current salary in the pay-scale applicable to a Full Time Lecturer.

4.

It appears that in view of the aforesaid, the petitioner has not given any further instructions in the matter. In the light of the aforesaid, the interim relief granted earlier is made absolute with liberty to the parties to apply in case of any contingency.

5.

Rule is disposed of. No costs.

6.

With the disposal of the writ petition, the pending Notice of Motion is also disposed of.

[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J. ] 2/2 7-WP-1210-2005 & NMW-271-2004.doc Dixit