← Library
Bombay High CourtOLR/4/2022disposed off

Official Liquidaotr Of Etisalat Db Telecom Pvt. Ltd. (In Liquidation) v. Etisalat Mauritius Limited

2022-03-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar2 pages

14-olr-4-2022.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR REPORT NO.04 OF 2022 IN COMPANY PETITION NO.114 OF 2012 In the matter of Companies Act, I of 1956 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR And In the matter of M/s. Etisalat DB Telecom Private Limited (In Liqn.) VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2022.03.24 17:24:04 +0530 Etisalat Mauritius Limited

...Petitioner

None for the Petitioner.

Ms. Mansi Kaku i/b. Mr. Jonathan Solomon, Legal Advisor to the Official Liquidator.

Mr. Mahendhar Aithe, Company Prosecutor for Official Liquidator. CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

MARCH 23, 2022 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2.

The learned counsel submits that pursuant to the order passed by Supreme Court dated 1st September, 2020 in Suo Moto Contempt Petition (Civil) No. 1 of 2020 with M.A. No. 725-796 in Civil Appeals Nos. 6328-6399 of 2015, it is necessary to make payment towards second installment AGR dues, for the year 2022. The learned counsel invited the attention of the Court to the order passed by this Court on 30th March, 2021, in Official Liquidator's Report No. 26 of 2021, for the preceding year. Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...1

14-olr-4-2022.doc 3.

For the reasons assigned in the application, especially paragraph 11 of the application, the application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

4.

The Official Liquidator also seeks permission to adjudicate the revised claim of the Department of Telecom.

5.

For the reasons assigned in paragraph 9 of the application, the Official Liquidator's Report stands allowed in terms of prayer clause (b).

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...2