Sony Music Entertainment India Pvt Ltd v. Archies Ltd And 2 ORS

908-S866-16+.DOC ATUL

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 866 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 209 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2770 OF 2016 Sony Music Entertainment India Pvt. Ltd.

...Plaintiffs

Versus

Archies Limited & 2 Others ...Defendants Mr. Amit Jamsandekar, i/b Mr. P.M. Jadhav, for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Vinod Bhagat, with Mr. Shantanu Sood, Mr. Dhiren Karania & Ms. Parveen Anand, i/b G.S. Hegde & V.A. Bhagat, for Defendant No. 1.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

20th December 2016 PC:- 1.

The Suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the representatives of the Plaintiffs and the 1st Defendant, as also by their Attorneys.

2.

I am satisfied that the Consent Terms are in in order and not contrary to law, have been drawn by the parties of their own volition without any fraud, coercion or undue influence, in reflection of their 20th December 2016

908-S866-16+.DOC true intentions. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

3.

The Suit is disposed of in accordance with the consent Terms. Drawn up decree dispensed with. Refund of court fee, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

4.

A scanned copy of the Consent Terms is to be separately uploaded with today's date as Order No. 2.

5.

Both the Notices of Motion are infructuous and are disposed of as such.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) 20th December 2016