Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Panvel Circle And 4 ORS.

Priya Soparkar 7 to 11 wp 230-19 and ors-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.230 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.231 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.232 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.233 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.235 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.251 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.255 OF 2019 WITH WRIT PETITION NO.237 OF 2019 Johnson Matthey Chemicals India Pvt. Ltd.

... Petitioner V/s.

Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Panvel Circle and ors.

... Respondent --- Mr.Nishant Thakkar with Mr.Hiten Chande i/by M/s PDS Legal for the Petitioner.

Mr.Sham Walve for the Respondent.

--- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.

DATE : FEBRUARY 14, 2019.

P.C.:- 1.

Out of these petitions, Writ Petition Nos.251 of 2019, 255 of 2019 and 237 of 2019 were not on board. On account of

Priya Soparkar 7 to 11 wp 230-19 and ors-o identical issues and as requested by the learned Advocates, these petitions are taken on board.

2.

This group of petitions is filed by the same petitioner. The reason for filing the petitions was non-realizing of the refund by the Assessing Officer for several assessment years. Learned counsel for the parties jointly stated that after filing of the petitions development taken place which specifically resolved the controversy. They placed on record the Minutes of the Joint Meeting dated 31st January, 2019 between the representative of the petitioner and the Assessing Officer concerned. 3.

Learned counsel Shri Walve for the Assessing Officer stated that the Assessing Officer will proceed according to the understanding recorded in the Minutes. Learned counsel Shri Thakkar for the petitioner stated that the petitioner is satisfied with the mechanism provided in such meeting. 4.

In the result, petitions are disposed of.

(M.S.SANKLECHA,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.) ....