Saveetha Engineering College And 4 ORS v. M/S Tata Capital Financial Services Limited And 2 ORS

3-10arbp181-16 vai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO.181 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.177 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.205 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.182 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.184 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.186 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.188 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.197 OF 2016 WITH ARBITRATION PETITION NO.201 OF 2016 AND ARBITRATION PETITION NO.203 OF 2016 M/s.Saveetha Engineering College & Ors.

...Petitioners

V/s.

M/s.Tata Capital Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

...Respondents

Ms.Rita Joshi i/b Mr.Ashok Shetty for the Petitioners. Mr.Sriniwas Atre i/b India Law for the Respondent No.1. CORAM : R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE : 4TH AUGUST, 2016.

P.C. :- 1.

There is no dispute that the respondent no.1 herein had filed the arbitration petitions for interim measures under section 9 of 1/2

3-10arbp181-16 the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 arising out of the said agreement before the Madras High Court. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 has raised an objection about the maintainability of these arbitration petitions in this Court by placing reliance on section 42 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996. In view of the objections raised by the learned counsel for the respondent no.1, the learned counsel for the petitioners prays that these arbitration petitions be transferred to Madras High Court. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent no.1 has no objection if these arbitration petitions are transferred to the Madras High Court. Statement is accepted.

2.

The office is directed to transfer the papers and proceedings in all the aforesaid arbitration petitions to the Madras High Court expeditiously.

(R.D. DHANUKA, J.) 2/2