M/S.Neo Sannyas Foundation v. The Commissioner Of Central Excise Pune-Iii

1-NMA.443.2016.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 24 OF 2016 M/s. Neo Sannyas Foundation } Applicant versus The Commissioner of Central } Excise, Pune - III } Respondent Mr. Mihir Naniwadekar i/b. Mr. Ajay Kumar for the applicant.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B.

Mishra for the respondent.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :- JUNE 13, 2016 P.C. :- Having heard both sides and perusing the affidavit in support of the notice of motion, we find that there is sufficient cause made out for condoning the delay. The notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs. (DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA