Trimurtiplast Containers Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Central Excise Pune-Iii

mdp 1/1 nm 178-19.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.178 OF 2019 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L.)NO.10 OF 2019 Trimurti Containers Private Limited ...Appellant

Versus

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III, Office of Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune-III.

...Respondent

Ms. Pragya Koolwal, M/s. UBR Legal for appellant. Mr. Sham Walve and Mr. Ram Ochani for respondent. CORAM :

A.S.OKA AND M.S.SANKLECHA, JJ.

DATE :

12th April 2019 P.C.:

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the appellant and learned Counsel appearing for the respondent. The delay is explained by the appellant on the basis of the time spent in filing and prosecuting application for rectification of mistake. Sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay. Accordingly, Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).

(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)