Sheetal Dhruv Vora v. Hima Ameet Mehta

902TS-14-12.

DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 14 OF 2012 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1176 OF 2011 Sheetal Dhruv Vora ...Plaintiff

Versus

Hima Ameet Mehta ...Defendant Mr. Rahul Karnik, i/b Dwij Mahimtara, for the Plaintiff. Mr. N. C. Parekh, i/b M/s. Mansukhlal Hiralal & Co., for the Defendant.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

4th August 2015 PC:- 1.

The suit is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant. Both Parties are personally present in Court. On instructions, learned Advocate for the Defendant states that the Defendant unconditionally withdraws her Caveat.

2.

Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

902TS-14-12.

DOC 3.

The Suit and the Petition are disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. Decree to be drawn accordingly. (G. S. PATEL, J.)